Today Jezebel commented on the collection John Galliano just showed in Paris for the Christian Dior Spring 2009 collection, saying that the heels were “either torturous bondage-esque contraptions or – in one case – crafted so that the wearer appears to be held up by tiny fertility dolls.”
If these are what they meant by torturous bondage-esque contraptions, then bring it on. I think these are actually pretty fabulous:
Don’t get me wrong, I couldn’t pull these off in a million years. But I just love the height, the heel shape, the triangley strappiness, and that fierce red colour (can I say fierce? I know, it’s over.)
However, the fertility dolls heels are just a little too “what the hell” for my taste:
I think that John Galliano must have been sitting in his study admiring all of his worldly artefacts from years of exotic travel, spotted a beautiful African fertility doll, and was suddenly overcome with the urge to incorporate it into his work. However, I am lost as to how that translates into shiny chrome, tacky chain-link fence, and sugary fuscia.
Seeing a traditional African symbol under the heel of a ridiculously overpriced and frivolus consumer product with a brand name stamp makes me think that this has to be some kind of covert social commentary. And then there’s the underfed fashion model vs. curvy, fertile womanly body angle. Maybe Galliano is cooler than I thought.






At first glance, this is a pretty swoonworthy shoe.